Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
4.
Canadian Medical Association Journal ; 192(13):338, 2020.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-823895

ABSTRACT

Coomes et al present several facts about quarantine. Quarantine is a strategy for containment of infectious diseases that differs from isolation. Quarantine sequesters healthy, asymptomatic people exposed to an infectious disease for the duration of the incubation period, to contain the spread of the disease. In contrast, isolation refers to separating patients with active infection from healthy, unexposed people, to prevent transmission.

5.
Rev Med Virol ; 30(6): 1-9, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-731138

ABSTRACT

Coronaviruses may activate dysregulated host immune responses. As exploratory studies have suggested that interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels are elevated in cases of complicated Covid-19, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the evidence in this field. We systematically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies investigating the immunological response in Covid-19; additional grey literature searches were undertaken. Study selection and data abstraction was undertaken independently by two authors. Meta-analysis was undertaken using random effects models to compute ratios of means with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs). Eight published studies and two preprints (n = 1798) were eligible for inclusion. Meta-analysis of mean IL-6 concentrations demonstrated 2.9-fold higher levels in patients with complicated Covid-19 compared with patients with noncomplicated disease (six studies; n = 1302; 95%CI, 1.17-7.19; I2 = 100%). Consistent results were found in sensitivity analyses exclusively restricted to studies comparing patients requiring ICU admission vs no ICU admission (two studies; n = 540; ratio of means = 3.24; 95%CI, 2.54-4.14; P < .001; I2 = 87%). Nine of ten studies were assessed to have at least moderate risk of bias. In patients with Covid-19, IL-6 levels are significantly elevated and associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Inhibition of IL-6 may be a novel target for therapeutics for the management of dysregulated host responses in patients with Covid-19 and high-quality studies of intervention in this field are urgently required.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/metabolism , COVID-19/virology , Host-Pathogen Interactions , Interleukin-6/metabolism , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Biomarkers , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/therapy , Cytokine Release Syndrome/etiology , Cytokines/metabolism , Humans , Prognosis , Publication Bias
7.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 16(11): 2586-2593, 2020 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-660414

ABSTRACT

Despite major advances in vaccination over the past century, resurgence of vaccine-preventable illnesses has led the World Health Organization to identify vaccine hesitancy as a major threat to global health. Vaccine hesitancy may be fueled by health information obtained from a variety of sources, including new media such as the Internet and social media platforms. As access to technology has improved, social media has attained global penetrance. In contrast to traditional media, social media allow individuals to rapidly create and share content globally without editorial oversight. Users may self-select content streams, contributing to ideological isolation. As such, there are considerable public health concerns raised by anti-vaccination messaging on such platforms and the consequent potential for downstream vaccine hesitancy, including the compromise of public confidence in future vaccine development for novel pathogens, such as SARS-CoV-2 for the prevention of COVID-19. In this review, we discuss the current position of social media platforms in propagating vaccine hesitancy and explore next steps in how social media may be used to improve health literacy and foster public trust in vaccination.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Information Dissemination/methods , Social Media , Vaccination Refusal/psychology , Vaccination/psychology , COVID-19/psychology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Primary Prevention/methods , Propaganda , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination Refusal/statistics & numerical data , Vaccine-Preventable Diseases/epidemiology
10.
Oncologist ; 25(6): e936-e945, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-31492

ABSTRACT

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly spread globally since being identified as a public health emergency of major international concern and has now been declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). In December 2019, an outbreak of atypical pneumonia, known as COVID-19, was identified in Wuhan, China. The newly identified zoonotic coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), is characterized by rapid human-to-human transmission. Many cancer patients frequently visit the hospital for treatment and disease surveillance. They may be immunocompromised due to the underlying malignancy or anticancer therapy and are at higher risk of developing infections. Several factors increase the risk of infection, and cancer patients commonly have multiple risk factors. Cancer patients appear to have an estimated twofold increased risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 than the general population. With the WHO declaring the novel coronavirus outbreak a pandemic, there is an urgent need to address the impact of such a pandemic on cancer patients. This include changes to resource allocation, clinical care, and the consent process during a pandemic. Currently and due to limited data, there are no international guidelines to address the management of cancer patients in any infectious pandemic. In this review, the potential challenges associated with managing cancer patients during the COVID-19 infection pandemic will be addressed, with suggestions of some practical approaches. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The main management strategies for treating cancer patients during the COVID-19 epidemic include clear communication and education about hand hygiene, infection control measures, high-risk exposure, and the signs and symptoms of COVID-19. Consideration of risk and benefit for active intervention in the cancer population must be individualized. Postponing elective surgery or adjuvant chemotherapy for cancer patients with low risk of progression should be considered on a case-by-case basis. Minimizing outpatient visits can help to mitigate exposure and possible further transmission. Telemedicine may be used to support patients to minimize number of visits and risk of exposure. More research is needed to better understand SARS-CoV-2 virology and epidemiology.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Neoplasms/therapy , Pandemics/prevention & control , Patient Care/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Hand Hygiene/organization & administration , Hand Hygiene/trends , Humans , Infection Control/organization & administration , Infection Control/trends , International Cooperation , Intersectoral Collaboration , Medical Oncology/economics , Medical Oncology/standards , Medical Oncology/trends , Patient Care/economics , Patient Care/trends , Patient Education as Topic , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Resource Allocation/economics , Resource Allocation/organization & administration , Resource Allocation/standards , Resource Allocation/trends , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine/economics , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Telemedicine/standards , Telemedicine/trends , World Health Organization
11.
Non-conventional in English | WHO COVID | ID: covidwho-276830
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL